Core i5-13600HX vs EPYC 7401P

Core i5-13600HX vs EPYC 7401P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13600HX

14 / 20

27,646

0.0%

27,836

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13600HX vs EPYC 7401P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13600HX vs EPYC 7401P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13600HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,646 vs 27,836).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.

EPYC 7401P

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7401P better than Core i5-13600HX?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7401P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7401P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7401P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7401P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13600HX vs EPYC 7401P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13600HX

The Core i5-13600HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,646 points. Launch price was $284.

EPYC 7401P

The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7401P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600HX versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600HX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13600HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7401P uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600HX scores 27,646 against the EPYC 7401P's 27,836 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7401P. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600HX vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P.

Feature	Core i5-13600HX	EPYC 7401P
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	24 / 48+71%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+60%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+30%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	27,646	27,836

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7401P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.