
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 86.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core i7-13700E
2023Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,824 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 86.7 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Core i5-13600K
2022Core i7-13700E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 86.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,824 vs 37,655).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 86.7 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Core i7-13700E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 138 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 817 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 328 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13700E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 846 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 846 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 754 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 682 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 810 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 724 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Core i7-13700E

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Core i7-13700E
Core i7-13700E
The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-13700E offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700E uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Core i7-13700E's 33,824 — a 10.7% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13700E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 24+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+84% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 30 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 37,655+11% | 33,824 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,775 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,118 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,711 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13700E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700E). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13700E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Embedded Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700E debuted at $390. On MSRP ($329 vs $390), the Core i5-13600K is $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 86.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700E — making the Core i5-13600K the 27.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Core i7-13700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-16% | $390 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+32% | 86.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













