
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,585 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,585 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 738 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 694 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 8.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+75% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| PassMark | 37,655+9% | 34,585 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,246 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,865 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Core i5-13600K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | Desktop | AI-Notebook |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($329 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is $329 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












