PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $12,651 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1691.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 350W, a 225W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon Max 9480 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 82,913).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 113 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Max 9480, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Max 9480

2023

Why buy it

✅+120.2% higher PassMark.
✅+368.8% larger total L3 cache (113 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 350W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Xeon Max 9480

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $12,651 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1691.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 350W, a 225W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon Max 9480 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+120.2% higher PassMark.
✅+368.8% larger total L3 cache (113 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 82,913).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 113 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Max 9480, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 350W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Xeon Max 9480?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Max 9480 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Max 9480 is the better fit. You are getting 120.2% better PassMark, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 368.8% larger total L3 cache (113 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is $12,651 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $12,980 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Max 9480 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 120.2% better PassMark. It is also 1691.8% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 6.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Max 9480 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 368.8% larger total L3 cache (113 MB vs 24 MB), more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 14/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Xeon Max 9480 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Max 9480
1080p
low	281 FPS	186 FPS
medium	264 FPS	168 FPS
high	220 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	153 FPS
medium	198 FPS	129 FPS
high	158 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	71 FPS
medium	133 FPS	63 FPS
high	102 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon Max 9480

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Max 9480
1080p
low	632 FPS	246 FPS
medium	533 FPS	221 FPS
high	450 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	205 FPS
medium	474 FPS	187 FPS
high	403 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	124 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	128 FPS
medium	282 FPS	119 FPS
high	269 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	83 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon Max 9480

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Max 9480
1080p
low	663 FPS	815 FPS
medium	543 FPS	738 FPS
high	477 FPS	704 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	725 FPS
medium	499 FPS	652 FPS
high	434 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	548 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	487 FPS
medium	381 FPS	398 FPS
high	344 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	294 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon Max 9480

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Max 9480
1080p
low	941 FPS	1066 FPS
medium	941 FPS	953 FPS
high	923 FPS	813 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	885 FPS
medium	850 FPS	761 FPS
high	738 FPS	646 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	532 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	644 FPS
medium	588 FPS	565 FPS
high	529 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	413 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon Max 9480

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon Max 9480

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon Max 9480

The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Max 9480 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Max 9480 has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 — a 37.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon Max 9480's 82,913 — a 75.1% lead for the Xeon Max 9480. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Max 9480
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	56 / 112+300%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+46%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+84%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB	112.5 MB+369%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023)
PassMark	37,655	82,913+120%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	55,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon Max 9480 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 8 (Xeon Max 9480). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 80 (Xeon Max 9480) — the Xeon Max 9480 offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and C741 (Xeon Max 9480).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Max 9480
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	80+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Max 9480 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Max 9480 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Max 9480
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	HPC Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Max 9480 debuted at $12980. On MSRP ($329 vs $12980), the Core i5-13600K is $12651 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Max 9480 — making the Core i5-13600K the 178.9% better value option.