
Core i5-13600T
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+55.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.6 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,364 vs 2,537).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+7.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,611 vs 18,100).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.6 vs 110.6 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13600T.
Core i5-13600T
2023Core i7-13700T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+55.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.6 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700T.
Why buy it
- ✅+7.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,364 vs 2,537).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,611 vs 18,100).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.6 vs 110.6 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13600T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600T better than Core i7-13700T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600T | Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600T | Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600T | Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 685 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 283 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600T | Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 697 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 697 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 629 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 685 FPS |
| high | 555 FPS | 592 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600T and Core i7-13700T

Core i5-13600T
Core i5-13600T
The Core i5-13600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,202 points. Launch price was $255.

Core i7-13700T
Core i7-13700T
The Core i7-13700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,890 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-13700T offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600T versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13700T — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600T scores 28,202 against the Core i7-13700T's 27,890 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-13600T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,100 vs 11,611 (43.7% advantage for the Core i5-13600T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,364 vs 2,537, a 7.1% lead for the Core i7-13700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,911 vs 15,020 (31.7% advantage for the Core i7-13700T). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600T vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700T.
| Feature | Core i5-13600T | Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 24+14% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz+29% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,202+1% | 27,890 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,100+56% | 11,611 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,364 | 2,537+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,911 | 15,020+38% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i7-13700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i5-13600T) and Z790,B760,H770,H710 (Core i7-13700T).
| Feature | Core i5-13600T | Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600T) and UHD 770 (Core i7-13700T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600T targets Quiet Desktop / SFF PC, Core i7-13700T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600T rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-13700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-13600T | Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | UHD 770 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Quiet Desktop / SFF PC | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600T launched at $255 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700T debuted at $384. On MSRP ($255 vs $384), the Core i5-13600T is $129 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600T delivers 110.6 pts/$ vs 72.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700T — making the Core i5-13600T the 41.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600T | Core i7-13700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $255-34% | $384 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.6+52% | 72.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












