
Core i5-13600T

Xeon W-2195
Core i5-13600T vs Xeon W-2195 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13600T vs Xeon W-2195 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13600T vs Xeon W-2195: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13600T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon W-2195 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2195.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,100 vs 21,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 110.6 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Xeon W-2195
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Costs $105 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 110.6 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13600T.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Core i5-13600T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13600T vs Xeon W-2195 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13600T
The Core i5-13600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,202 points. Launch price was $255.

Xeon W-2195
The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600T versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 11% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600T scores 28,202 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-13600T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,100 vs 21,000 (14.8% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,364 vs 1,300, a 58.1% lead for the Core i5-13600T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,911 vs 10,002 (8.7% advantage for the Core i5-13600T). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600T vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.
| Feature | Core i5-13600T | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 18 / 36+29% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24.75 MB (total)+3% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 28,202 | 27,977 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,100 | 21,000+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,364+82% | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,911+9% | 10,002 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13600T versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2195 — the Core i5-13600T supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2195 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600T) vs 4 (Xeon W-2195). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600T) vs 48 (Xeon W-2195) — the Xeon W-2195 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i5-13600T) and C422 (Xeon W-2195).
| Feature | Core i5-13600T | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200+80% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 512 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2195 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-13600T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-2195 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600T targets Quiet Desktop / SFF PC, Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600T rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| Feature | Core i5-13600T | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Quiet Desktop / SFF PC | Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13600T was priced at $255, while the Xeon W-2195 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($255 vs $150), Xeon W-2195 was $105 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600T delivers 110.6 pts/$ vs 186.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2195 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 51.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600T | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $255 | $150-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.6 | 186.5+69% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














