PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-14400F

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $213 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 131.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,670 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-14400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 131.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Core i5-14400F

2024

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $213 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 131.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.1% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-14400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,670 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 131.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i5-14400F?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 25.1% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data and 78.4% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.1% more average FPS across 41 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 78.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-14400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-13700K is 108.7% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.1% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-14400F is also 17.0% better value on MSRP (131.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-14400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-14400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-14400F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	170 FPS	284 FPS
medium	154 FPS	268 FPS
high	126 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	190 FPS
1440p
low	145 FPS	238 FPS
medium	126 FPS	200 FPS
high	100 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	159 FPS
medium	76 FPS	134 FPS
high	61 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i5-14400F Open Core i7-13700K

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-14400F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	548 FPS	689 FPS
medium	466 FPS	580 FPS
high	390 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	354 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	457 FPS	595 FPS
medium	402 FPS	525 FPS
high	345 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	275 FPS	348 FPS
medium	244 FPS	314 FPS
high	229 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	202 FPS	261 FPS

Open Core i5-14400F Open Core i7-13700K

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-14400F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	642 FPS	648 FPS
medium	610 FPS	530 FPS
high	540 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	458 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	642 FPS	591 FPS
medium	548 FPS	491 FPS
high	479 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	371 FPS
4K
low	494 FPS	434 FPS
medium	412 FPS	374 FPS
high	370 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	311 FPS	290 FPS

Open Core i5-14400F Open Core i7-13700K

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-14400F	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	642 FPS	970 FPS
medium	642 FPS	883 FPS
high	642 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	596 FPS	689 FPS
1440p
low	642 FPS	829 FPS
medium	642 FPS	740 FPS
high	565 FPS	642 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	566 FPS
4K
low	515 FPS	567 FPS
medium	471 FPS	515 FPS
high	418 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	363 FPS	404 FPS

Open Core i5-14400F Open Core i7-13700K

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14400F and Core i7-13700K

Core i5-14400F

The Core i5-14400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,670 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-14400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-14400F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14400F scores 25,670 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 56.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.

Feature	Core i5-14400F	Core i7-13700K
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 24+60%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	5.4 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark	25,670	45,784+78%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,846
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,980

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i5-14400F	Core i7-13700K
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14400F) vs true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-14400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14400F targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i5-14400F	Core i7-13700K
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-14400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($196 vs $409), the Core i5-14400F is $213 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14400F delivers 131.0 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i5-14400F the 15.7% better value option.