Core 7 250H vs Core i5-14400F

Intel

Core 7 250H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-14400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024
Core family
·······

Core 7 250H vs Core i5-14400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 250H vs Core i5-14400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 250H vs Core i5-14400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 250H

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (25,530 vs 25,670).

Core i5-14400F

2024

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 250H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core 7 250H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 250H better than Core i5-14400F?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 7 250H is ahead with a 18.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14400F pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core 7 250H also has the bigger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 7 250H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-14400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core 7 250H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-14400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i5-14400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (131.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 250H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 7 250H vs Core i5-14400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 7 250H

The Core 7 250H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,530 points. Launch price was $502.

Intel

Core i5-14400F

The Core i5-14400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,670 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Core 7 250H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i5-14400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 250H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core 7 250H versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400F — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core 7 250H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 7 250H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-14400F uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 250H scores 25,530 against the Core i5-14400F's 25,670 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-14400F. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 250H vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400F.

FeatureCore 7 250HCore i5-14400F
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+40%
10 / 16
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+15%
4.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+20%
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
25,530
25,670
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 250H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-14400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 250HCore i5-14400F
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 250H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14400F). Primary use case: Core i5-14400F targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 7 250HCore i5-14400F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop