
Core 7 250H vs EPYC 7551

Core 7 250H

EPYC 7551
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 7 250H
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7551
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 7 250H | EPYC 7551 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 7 250H | EPYC 7551 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 250H and EPYC 7551

Core 7 250H
The Core 7 250H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,530 points. Launch price was $502.

EPYC 7551
The EPYC 7551 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,844 points. Launch price was $3,400.
Processing Power
The Core 7 250H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7551 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7551 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core 7 250H versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core 7 250H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 7 250H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7551 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 250H scores 25,530 against the EPYC 7551's 25,844 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 7551. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 250H vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551.
| Feature | Core 7 250H | EPYC 7551 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 32 / 64+129% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+80% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 25,530 | 25,844+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 250H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7551 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 250H | EPYC 7551 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















