
Core i5-2310

Xeon Platinum 8452Y
Core i5-2310 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2310 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2310 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2310
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 300W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 2000, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8452Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 68 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8452Y, which brings 36 cores / 72 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $177 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Xeon Platinum 8452Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8452Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1025% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 36 cores / 72 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,641 vs 3,664).
- ❌215.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2310 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2310.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2310 better than Xeon Platinum 8452Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2310 vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2310
The Core i5-2310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,664 points. Launch price was $150.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y
The Xeon Platinum 8452Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,641 points. Launch price was $3,995.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2310 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8452Y has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-2310 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8452Y — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-2310 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2310 scores 3,664 against the Xeon Platinum 8452Y's 3,641 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-2310. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-2310 vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | Core i5-2310 | Xeon Platinum 8452Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 36 / 72+800% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 67.5 MB+1025% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 3,664 | 3,641 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 565 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,740 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2310 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-2310 | Xeon Platinum 8452Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-2310) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8452Y). The Core i5-2310 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon Platinum 8452Y requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-2310 | Xeon Platinum 8452Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













