Core i5-2435M
VS
Celeron G3900E

Core i5-2435M vs Celeron G3900E

Intel

Core i5-2435M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron G3900E

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2435M is positioned at rank 548 and the Celeron G3900E is on rank 816, so the Core i5-2435M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2435M

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
99%
#536
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
721%
#537
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
710%
#538
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
652%
#539
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
649%
#540
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
643%
#542
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
621%
#543
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
596%
#544
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
595%
#545
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
579%
#548
Core i5-2435M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16397%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15494%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11250%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3389%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2685%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2348%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1345%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1328%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1209%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1209%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1195%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1163%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1147%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1142%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1132%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
100%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
99%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
98%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
98%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
97%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
96%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
96%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G3900E leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-2435M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-2435MCeleron G3900E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-2435MCeleron G3900E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2435M and Celeron G3900E

Intel

Core i5-2435M

The Core i5-2435M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,035 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2435M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3900E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-2435M versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-2435M. The Core i5-2435M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G3900E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2435M scores 2,035 against the Celeron G3900E's 2,034 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-2435M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 525 vs 699, a 28.4% lead for the Celeron G3900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,025 vs 948 (7.8% advantage for the Core i5-2435M). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2435M vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E.

FeatureCore i5-2435MCeleron G3900E
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+25%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,035
2,034
Geekbench 6 Single
525
699+33%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,025+8%
948
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2435M versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900E — the Celeron G3900E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Core i5-2435M) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900E).

FeatureCore i5-2435MCeleron G3900E
Socket
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2435M) vs VT-x (Celeron G3900E). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2435M) and HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2435M targets Legacy Laptop, Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureCore i5-2435MCeleron G3900E
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Budget