PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2450P vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2450P vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2450P

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($177 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,850 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($177 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +155.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 429.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 24.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $177 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌
10.7% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$177 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-2450P?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 155.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 516.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 485.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 155.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 516.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 10.7% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $177 MSRP, and it still gives you a 155.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 429.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 24.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155, 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-2450P vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2450P

The Core i5-2450P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,273 points. Launch price was $215.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-2450P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-2450P versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-2450P uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2450P scores 4,273 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 141.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 545 vs 2,407, a 126.2% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,850 vs 11,408 (144.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2450P vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i5-2450P	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	10 / 16+150%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.6 GHz+31%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+28%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	20 MB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	32 nm	Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	4,273	25,029+486%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	545	2,407+342%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,850	11,408+517%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2450P uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2450P versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2450P) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,P67,Z68,H67,Q67 (Core i5-2450P) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Core i5-2450P	Core i5-13400F
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+260%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	192 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-2450P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-2450P	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-2450P was priced at $177, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($177 vs $196), Core i5-2450P was $19 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2450P delivers 24.1 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 136.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-2450P	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$177-10%	$196
Performance per Dollar	24.1	127.7+430%
Release Date	2012	2023

Search Core i5-2450P on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.