Core i5-2450P vs FX-6130

Core i5-2450P vs FX-6130 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-2450P

4 / 4

4,273

0.0%

4,353

+1.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2450P vs FX-6130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2450P vs FX-6130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2450P

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-6130.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6130 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,273 vs 4,353).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $177 MSRP, while FX-6130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

FX-6130

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2450P.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6130 better than Core i5-2450P?

Yes. FX-6130 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6130 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6130 is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-6130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $177 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-2450P only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-6130 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-2450P vs FX-6130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2450P

The Core i5-2450P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,273 points. Launch price was $215.

FX-6130

The FX-6130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,353 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-2450P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6130 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6130 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-2450P versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6130 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the FX-6130 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-2450P uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-6130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2450P scores 4,273 against the FX-6130's 4,353 — a 1.9% lead for the FX-6130. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2450P vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6130.

Feature	Core i5-2450P	FX-6130
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	6 MB+2300%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,273	4,353+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	545	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,850	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2450P uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-6130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-2450P	FX-6130
Socket	LGA1155	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-2450P) / not specified (FX-6130).

Feature	Core i5-2450P	FX-6130
Integrated GPU	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-2450P was priced at $177, while the FX-6130 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($177 vs $0), FX-6130 was $177 cheaper.

Feature	Core i5-2450P	FX-6130
MSRP	$177	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	24.1	—
Release Date	2012	2012

Search Core i5-2450P on Amazon

Search FX-6130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.