Core i5-2500S
VS
Xeon E5-2609 v2

Core i5-2500S vs Xeon E5-2609 v2

Intel

Core i5-2500S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2500S is positioned at rank 854 and the Xeon E5-2609 v2 is on rank 667, so the Xeon E5-2609 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17741%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16764%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12172%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3667%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2905%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2541%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1455%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1436%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1308%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1308%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1293%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1258%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1241%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1236%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1224%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
100%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
100%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
99%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
99%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
99%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
98%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
98%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
98%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
98%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
97%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
96%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
96%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
96%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12334%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2329%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2069%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1598%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
100%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
99%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
99%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
98%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
97%
#667
Xeon E5-2609 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
100%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
100%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#676
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
98%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i5-2500SXeon E5-2609 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2500S ($61), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($61 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i5-2500SXeon E5-2609 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2500S and Xeon E5-2609 v2

Intel

Core i5-2500S

The Core i5-2500S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,373 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v2

The Xeon E5-2609 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,369 points. Launch price was $396.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2500S and Xeon E5-2609 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500S versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v2 — a 38.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-2500S (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-2500S uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500S scores 3,373 against the Xeon E5-2609 v2's 3,369 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-2500S. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500S vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v2.

FeatureCore i5-2500SXeon E5-2609 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+48%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+8%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
10 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
3,373
3,369
Geekbench 6 Single
600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2500S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2609 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-2500SXeon E5-2609 v2
Socket
LGA1155
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2500S) / not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v2). The Core i5-2500S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon E5-2609 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500S targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500S rivals Phenom II X4 980.

FeatureCore i5-2500SXeon E5-2609 v2
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop