
Core i5-2520M

Pro A8-8600B
Core i5-2520M vs Pro A8-8600B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2520M vs Pro A8-8600B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2520M vs Pro A8-8600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2520M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Pro A8-8600B needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
Pro A8-8600B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,203 vs 2,241).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2520M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2520M better than Pro A8-8600B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2520M vs Pro A8-8600B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2520M
The Core i5-2520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,241 points. Launch price was $225.

Pro A8-8600B
The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-2520M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pro A8-8600B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A8-8600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-2520M versus 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-2520M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i5-2520M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pro A8-8600B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2520M scores 2,241 against the Pro A8-8600B's 2,203 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i5-2520M.
| Feature | Core i5-2520M | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+56% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2048 kB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 2,241+2% | 2,203 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2520M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pro A8-8600B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-2520M | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i5-2520M) / not specified (Pro A8-8600B). The Core i5-2520M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Pro A8-8600B requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2520M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.
| Feature | Core i5-2520M | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-2520M was priced at $225, while the Pro A8-8600B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($225 vs $150), Pro A8-8600B was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2520M delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Pro A8-8600B — making the Pro A8-8600B the 38.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2520M | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $150-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 14.7+47% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















