
A10-8700P

Core i5-2520M
A10-8700P vs Core i5-2520M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-8700P vs Core i5-2520M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Civilization VI

Euro Truck Simulator 2

Genshin Impact

Hearts of Iron IV
A10-8700P vs Core i5-2520M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-8700P
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-2520M
2011Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,241 vs 2,254).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-8700P better than Core i5-2520M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-8700P vs Core i5-2520M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P
The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-2520M
The Core i5-2520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,241 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The A10-8700P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2520M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-8700P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-2520M — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-2520M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Core i5-2520M's 2,241 — a 0.6% lead for the A10-8700P.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,254 | 2,241 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 480 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-8700P versus 1333 on the Core i5-2520M — the A10-8700P supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A10-8700P) vs 16 (Core i5-2520M) — the Core i5-2520M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A10-8700P) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2520M).
| Feature | A10-8700P | Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133+60% | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-8700P) vs true (Core i5-2520M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10-8700P) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2520M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U; Core i5-2520M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A10-8700P was priced at $150, while the Core i5-2520M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($150 vs $225), A10-8700P was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-8700P delivers 15.0 pts/$ vs 10.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-2520M — making the A10-8700P the 40.6% better value option.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-33% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0+50% | 10.0 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















