A10-8700P vs Athlon II X4 635

CPU

GPU

A10-8700P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon II X4 635

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A10-8700P vs Athlon II X4 635 Performance Spectrum

A10-8700P

4 / 4

2,254

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X4 635

4 / 4

2,248

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-8700P vs Athlon II X4 635 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-8700P vs Athlon II X4 635: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-8700P

2015

Why buy it

✅+166.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 167.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Athlon II X4 635 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 635.

Athlon II X4 635

2010

Why buy it

✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A10-8700P.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (180 vs 480).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (550 vs 1,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-8700P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-8700P better than Athlon II X4 635?

Yes. A10-8700P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 81.8% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-8700P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-8700P is the stronger fit. You are getting 81.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-8700P is the better buy right now. A10-8700P comes in $250 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 167.4% better value on MSRP (15.0 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-8700P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-8700P vs Athlon II X4 635 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P

The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X4 635

The Athlon II X4 635 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,248 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-8700P and Athlon II X4 635 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X4 635 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the A10-8700P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X4 635 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Athlon II X4 635's 2,248 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-8700P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 480 vs 180, a 90.9% lead for the A10-8700P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,000 vs 550 (58.1% advantage for the A10-8700P).

Feature	A10-8700P	Athlon II X4 635
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+10%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+61%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,254	2,248
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	658
Geekbench 6 Single	480+167%	180
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,000+82%	550

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 635 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-8700P versus DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Athlon II X4 635 — the A10-8700P supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A10-8700P) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 635) — the Athlon II X4 635 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A10-8700P) and AMD 770,785G,790FX,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X4 635).

Feature	A10-8700P	Athlon II X4 635
Socket	FP4	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+60%	DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon II X4 635 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A10-8700P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Athlon II X4 635 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop, Athlon II X4 635 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U.

Feature	A10-8700P	Athlon II X4 635
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R6	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-8700P was priced at $150, while the Athlon II X4 635 came in at $400. On launch pricing ($150 vs $400), A10-8700P was $250 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-8700P delivers 15.0 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 635 — making the A10-8700P the 91.1% better value option.

Feature	A10-8700P	Athlon II X4 635
MSRP	$150-63%	$400
Performance per Dollar	15.0+168%	5.6
Release Date	2015	2010

Search A10-8700P on Amazon

Search Athlon II X4 635 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.