A10-8700P vs Core i5-8200Y

A10-8700P vs Core i5-8200Y Performance Spectrum

A10-8700P

4 / 4

2,254

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-8200Y

2 / 4

2,245

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-8700P vs Core i5-8200Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-8700P vs Core i5-8200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-8700P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 5W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-8200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-8200Y

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-8700P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,254).
❌150% higher power demand at 5W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-8700P better than Core i5-8200Y?

Yes. A10-8700P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-8700P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-8700P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-8700P is the better buy right now. A10-8700P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8200Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-8700P vs Core i5-8200Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P

The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-8200Y

The Core i5-8200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $291.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-8700P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-8200Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-8700P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8200Y — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8200Y (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-8200Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Core i5-8200Y's 2,245 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-8700P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 480 vs 858, a 56.5% lead for the Core i5-8200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10-8700P	Core i5-8200Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.9 GHz+22%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+38%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,254	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	480	858+79%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8200Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-8700P versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-8200Y — the A10-8700P supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A10-8700P) vs 10 (Core i5-8200Y) — the A10-8700P offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A10-8700P) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8200Y).

Feature	A10-8700P	Core i5-8200Y
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+14%	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12+20%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-8700P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8200Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10-8700P) and UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-8200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop, Core i5-8200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U; Core i5-8200Y rivals Athlon 300U.