A10-8700P vs Celeron J3455

A10-8700P vs Celeron J3455 Performance Spectrum

A10-8700P

4 / 4

2,254

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron J3455

4 / 4

2,247

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-8700P vs Celeron J3455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-8700P vs Celeron J3455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-8700P

2015

Why buy it

✅+6.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron J3455 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron J3455

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (450 vs 480).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (850 vs 1,000).
❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-8700P better than Celeron J3455?

Yes. A10-8700P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 17.6% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.3% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-8700P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-8700P is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-8700P is the better buy right now. A10-8700P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3455 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-8700P vs Celeron J3455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P

The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron J3455

The Celeron J3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,247 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-8700P and Celeron J3455 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the A10-8700P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron J3455 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Celeron J3455's 2,247 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-8700P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 480 vs 450, a 6.5% lead for the A10-8700P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,000 vs 850 (16.2% advantage for the A10-8700P).

Feature	A10-8700P	Celeron J3455
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+20%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark	2,254	2,247
Geekbench 6 Single	480+7%	450
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,000+18%	850

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J3455 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-8700P versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455 — the Celeron J3455 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-8700P supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A10-8700P) vs 6 (Celeron J3455) — the A10-8700P offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A10-8700P) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455).

Feature	A10-8700P	Celeron J3455
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12+100%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-8700P) vs VT-x (Celeron J3455). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10-8700P) and HD Graphics 500 (Celeron J3455) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop, Celeron J3455 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U; Celeron J3455 rivals Pentium J4205.