A10-8700P vs Core i3-6006U

A10-8700P vs Core i3-6006U Performance Spectrum

A10-8700P

4 / 4

2,254

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-6006U

2 / 4

2,273

+0.8%

Celeron 847

Core i3-530

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-8700P vs Core i3-6006U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-8700P vs Core i3-6006U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-8700P

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (480 vs 630).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,000 vs 1,313).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i3-6006U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-6006U

2016

Why buy it

✅+31.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6006U better than A10-8700P?

Yes. Core i3-6006U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 31.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-6006U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6006U is the stronger fit. You are getting 31.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6006U is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i3-6006U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. A10-8700P only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-6006U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-8700P vs Core i3-6006U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P

The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-6006U

The Core i3-6006U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 November 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,273 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-8700P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6006U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-8700P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 2 GHz on the Core i3-6006U — a 46.2% clock advantage for the A10-8700P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-6006U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Core i3-6006U's 2,273 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-6006U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 480 vs 630, a 27% lead for the Core i3-6006U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,000 vs 1,313 (27.1% advantage for the Core i3-6006U).

Feature	A10-8700P	Core i3-6006U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,254	2,273
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	2,200
Geekbench 6 Single	480	630+31%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,000	1,313+31%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6006U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The Core i3-6006U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 12 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A10-8700P) and Skylake-U (Core i3-6006U).

Feature	A10-8700P	Core i3-6006U
Socket	FP4	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-8700P) vs Yes (Core i3-6006U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10-8700P) and HD Graphics 520 (Core i3-6006U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-6006U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U.