A10-8700P vs Celeron G3930

CPU

GPU

A10-8700P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G3930

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017

Buy on Amazon

A10-8700P vs Celeron G3930 Performance Spectrum

A10-8700P

4 / 4

2,254

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G3930

2 / 2

2,259

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-8700P vs Celeron G3930 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-8700P vs Celeron G3930: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-8700P

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 51W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (480 vs 750).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,000 vs 1,100).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

Celeron G3930

2017

Why buy it

✅+56.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $108 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 257.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.8 vs 15.0 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌2450% higher power demand at 51W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930 better than A10-8700P?

Yes. Celeron G3930 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 10% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3930 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930 comes in $108 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 257.9% better value on MSRP (53.8 vs 15.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-8700P vs Celeron G3930 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P

The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-8700P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3930 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-8700P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the A10-8700P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G3930 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Celeron G3930's 2,259 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G3930. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 480 vs 750, a 43.9% lead for the Celeron G3930 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,000 vs 1,100 (9.5% advantage for the Celeron G3930).

Feature	A10-8700P	Celeron G3930
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+10%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+61%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,254	2,259
Geekbench 6 Single	480	750+56%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,000	1,100+10%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3930 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-8700P versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930 — the Celeron G3930 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A10-8700P) vs 16 (Celeron G3930) — the Celeron G3930 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A10-8700P) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930).

Feature	A10-8700P	Celeron G3930
Socket	FP4	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-8700P) vs VT-x (Celeron G3930). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10-8700P) and HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop, Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U; Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.

Feature	A10-8700P	Celeron G3930
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R6	HD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-8700P was priced at $150, while the Celeron G3930 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($150 vs $42), Celeron G3930 was $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-8700P delivers 15.0 pts/$ vs 53.8 pts/$ for the Celeron G3930 — making the Celeron G3930 the 112.7% better value option.

Feature	A10-8700P	Celeron G3930
MSRP	$150	$42-72%
Performance per Dollar	15.0	53.8+259%
Release Date	2015	2017

Search A10-8700P on Amazon

Search Celeron G3930 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.