
A10-8700P

Core 2 Duo T6500
A10-8700P vs Core 2 Duo T6500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-8700P vs Core 2 Duo T6500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-8700P vs Core 2 Duo T6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-8700P
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core 2 Duo T6500 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T6500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core 2 Duo T6500
2009Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-8700P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,249 vs 2,254).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-8700P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-8700P better than Core 2 Duo T6500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-8700P vs Core 2 Duo T6500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P
The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo T6500
The Core 2 Duo T6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,249 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The A10-8700P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T6500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-8700P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6500 — a 41.5% clock advantage for the A10-8700P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Core 2 Duo T6500's 2,249 — a 0.2% lead for the A10-8700P.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Core 2 Duo T6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+52% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 2 MB |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,254 | 2,249 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 480 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T6500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-8700P versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T6500 — the A10-8700P supports 166.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-8700P supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A10-8700P) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo T6500) — the Core 2 Duo T6500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A10-8700P) and PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6500).
| Feature | A10-8700P | Core 2 Duo T6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133+167% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-8700P) vs false (Core 2 Duo T6500). The A10-8700P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core 2 Duo T6500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U.
| Feature | A10-8700P | Core 2 Duo T6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | false |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















