
Core i5-2540M

Core m5-6Y57
Core i5-2540M vs Core m5-6Y57 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-2540M vs Core m5-6Y57 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-2540M vs Core m5-6Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-2540M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($266 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core m5-6Y57 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌677.8% higher power demand at 35W vs 4.5W.
Core m5-6Y57
2015Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,342 vs 2,356).
- ❌5.6% HIGHER MSRP$281 MSRPvs$266 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2540M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2540M better than Core m5-6Y57?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2540M vs Core m5-6Y57 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2540M
The Core i5-2540M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $266.

Core m5-6Y57
The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-2540M and Core m5-6Y57 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2540M versus 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-2540M (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i5-2540M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2540M scores 2,356 against the Core m5-6Y57's 2,342 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-2540M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2540M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57.
| Feature | Core i5-2540M | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+18% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+136% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Skylake-Y (2015) |
| PassMark | 2,356 | 2,342 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-2540M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-2540M | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i5-2540M) / not specified (Core m5-6Y57). The Core i5-2540M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core m5-6Y57 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2540M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.
| Feature | Core i5-2540M | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-2540M was priced at $266, while the Core m5-6Y57 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($266 vs $281), Core i5-2540M was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2540M delivers 8.9 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Core m5-6Y57 — making the Core i5-2540M the 6.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-2540M | Core m5-6Y57 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $266-5% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.9+7% | 8.3 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














