Core i5-2550K
VS
Core i3-8109U

Core i5-2550K vs Core i3-8109U

Intel

Core i5-2550K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-8109U

2 Cores4 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2550K is positioned at rank 841 and the Core i3-8109U is on rank 857, so the Core i5-2550K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2550K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17327%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16372%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11888%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3581%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2837%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2482%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1421%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1403%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1277%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1277%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1263%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1229%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1212%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1207%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1196%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
100%
#842
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
100%
#844
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#845
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
99%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
99%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
99%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
99%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
99%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
99%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
98%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8109U

#845
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1402%
#846
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1382%
#847
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1269%
#848
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1263%
#849
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1251%
#851
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1208%
#852
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1159%
#853
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1157%
#854
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1126%
#857
Core i3-8109U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-8109U (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-2550KCore i3-8109U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($46)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2550K (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-2550KCore i3-8109U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($46)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2550K and Core i3-8109U

Intel

Core i5-2550K

The Core i5-2550K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,228 points. Launch price was $189.

Intel

Core i3-8109U

The Core i3-8109U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,184 points. Launch price was $304.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2550K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-8109U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2550K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-2550K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-8109U — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-2550K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-2550K uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-8109U uses Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2550K scores 4,228 against the Core i3-8109U's 4,184 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-2550K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 707 vs 1,100, a 43.5% lead for the Core i3-8109U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2550K vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8109U.

FeatureCore i5-2550KCore i3-8109U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+6%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+13%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
4,228+1%
4,184
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,058
Geekbench 6 Single
707
1,100+56%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,010
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2550K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-8109U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-2550K versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8109U — the Core i3-8109U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i5-2550KCore i3-8109U
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-2550K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8109U). The Core i3-8109U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics 655), while the Core i5-2550K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8109U targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-8109U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureCore i5-2550KCore i3-8109U
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Performance Laptop