Core i5-2557M
VS
Core i3-550

Core i5-2557M vs Core i3-550

Intel

Core i5-2557M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-550

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2557M is positioned at rank 36 and the Core i3-550 is on rank 965, so the Core i5-2557M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2557M

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
88%
#24
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
181%
#25
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
179%
#26
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
164%
#27
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
163%
#28
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
162%
#30
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
156%
#31
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
150%
#32
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
150%
#33
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
146%
#36
Core i5-2557M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
96%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
95%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
92%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26350%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24898%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18078%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5446%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4314%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3774%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2161%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2133%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1942%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1942%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1869%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1843%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1835%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1818%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
100%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
100%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
99%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
99%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
98%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
98%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
98%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
96%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
94%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
93%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
93%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2557M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-550 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-2557MCore i3-550
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-2557MCore i3-550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2557M and Core i3-550

Intel

Core i5-2557M

The Core i5-2557M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core i3-550

The Core i3-550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,632 points. Launch price was $101.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2557M and Core i3-550 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-2557M versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-550 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i3-550 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-2557M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-550 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2557M scores 1,618 against the Core i3-550's 1,632 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-550. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 521 vs 437, a 17.5% lead for the Core i5-2557M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 882 vs 899 (1.9% advantage for the Core i3-550). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2557M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-550.

FeatureCore i5-2557MCore i3-550
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+19%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+88%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,618
1,632
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,320
Geekbench 6 Single
521+19%
437
Geekbench 6 Multi
882
899+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2557M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-550 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i3-550 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QS67 (Core i5-2557M) and H55,H57,P55,Q57 (Core i3-550).

FeatureCore i5-2557MCore i3-550
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2557M) vs Yes (Core i3-550). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2557M) and Intel HD Graphics (Core i3-550) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2557M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-2557M rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureCore i5-2557MCore i3-550
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Budget