Core i5-3317U
VS
Celeron G3930T

Core i5-3317U vs Celeron G3930T

Intel

Core i5-3317U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron G3930T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-3317U is positioned at rank 932 and the Celeron G3930T is on rank 435, so the Celeron G3930T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3317U

#920
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1676%
#921
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1651%
#922
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1516%
#923
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1509%
#924
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1495%
#926
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1444%
#927
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1384%
#928
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1382%
#929
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1345%
#932
Core i5-3317U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6471%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6115%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4440%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1337%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1059%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
927%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
531%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
524%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
477%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
477%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
472%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
459%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
453%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
451%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
447%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
98%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
98%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
97%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
96%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
96%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
100%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
100%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
97%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
95%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3930T (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-3317UCeleron G3930T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3317U (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-3317UCeleron G3930T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3317U and Celeron G3930T

Intel

Core i5-3317U

The Core i5-3317U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,014 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Celeron G3930T

The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3317U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3930T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-3317U versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-3317U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G3930T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3317U scores 2,014 against the Celeron G3930T's 2,023 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G3930T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3317U vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T.

FeatureCore i5-3317UCeleron G3930T
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz+4%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2.7 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,014
2,023
Geekbench 6 Single
704
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3317U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3930T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i5-3317U versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T — the Core i5-3317U supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3317U) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T).

FeatureCore i5-3317UCeleron G3930T
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600+39900%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32
64 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-3317U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3317U) and Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3317U rivals AMD A8-4555M; Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.

FeatureCore i5-3317UCeleron G3930T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop