Core i5-3340 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i5-3340 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G Performance Spectrum

Core i5-3340

4 / 4

4,249

+2.1%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2 / 4

4,162

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3340 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3340 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3340

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1606G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌413.3% higher power demand at 77W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 77W, a 62W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3340 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,162 vs 4,249).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3340 better than Ryzen Embedded R1606G?

Yes. Core i5-3340 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3340 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3340 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3340 is the better buy right now. Core i5-3340 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $182 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1606G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-3340 vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3340

The Core i5-3340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,249 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,162 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3340 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-3340 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3340 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1606G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-3340 scores 4,249 against the Ryzen Embedded R1606G's 4,162 — a 2.1% lead for the Core i5-3340. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-3340 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

Feature	Core i5-3340	Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+19%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	512 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	—	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	4,249+2%	4,162

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3340 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-3340	Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Socket	LGA1155	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-3340 was priced at $182, while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G came in at $0. On launch pricing ($182 vs $0), Ryzen Embedded R1606G was $182 cheaper.

Feature	Core i5-3340	Ryzen Embedded R1606G
MSRP	$182	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	23.3	—
Release Date	2013	2019

Search Core i5-3340 on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded R1606G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.