Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-3340

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-3340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-3340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900E

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Delivers 245.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.6 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Draws 46W instead of 77W, a 31W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i5-3340

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,249 vs 4,272).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 80.6 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌67.4% higher power demand at 77W vs 46W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Celeron G6900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900E better than Core i5-3340?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-3340 is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900E pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i5-3340 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900E is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900E comes in $129 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-3340 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 245.3% better value on MSRP (80.6 vs 23.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1155, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-3340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900E

The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3340

The Core i5-3340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,249 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-3340 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-3340 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3340 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Celeron G6900E is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the Core i5-3340's 4,249 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G6900E. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-3340.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Core i5-3340
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.1 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	—
PassMark	4,272	4,249
Geekbench 6 Single	1,563	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,631	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-3340 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Core i5-3340
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) / not specified (Core i5-3340). The Celeron G6900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i5-3340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Core i5-3340
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900E was priced at $53, while the Core i5-3340 came in at $182. On launch pricing ($53 vs $182), Celeron G6900E was $129 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900E delivers 80.6 pts/$ vs 23.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3340 — making the Celeron G6900E the 110.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Core i5-3340
MSRP	$53-71%	$182
Performance per Dollar	80.6+246%	23.3
Release Date	2022	2013

Search Celeron G6900E on Amazon

Search Core i5-3340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.