Athlon PRO 300GE vs Celeron G6900E

CPU

GPU

Athlon PRO 300GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G6900E

2 Cores2 Thrd46 WWMax: 3 GHz2022

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Celeron G6900E Performance Spectrum

Athlon PRO 300GE

2 / 4

4,342

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Celeron G6900E

2 / 2

4,272

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Celeron G6900E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Celeron G6900E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon PRO 300GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $3 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 46W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Celeron G6900E

2022

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,272 vs 4,342).
❌
6% HIGHER MSRP
$53 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌31.4% higher power demand at 46W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon PRO 300GE better than Celeron G6900E?

Yes. Athlon PRO 300GE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon PRO 300GE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon PRO 300GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon PRO 300GE is the better buy right now. Athlon PRO 300GE comes in $3 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 7.7% better value on MSRP (86.8 vs 80.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Celeron G6900E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Celeron G6900E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 300GE

The Athlon PRO 300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,342 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron G6900E

The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon PRO 300GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G6900E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Athlon PRO 300GE. The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Celeron G6900E uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300GE scores 4,342 against the Celeron G6900E's 4,272 — a 1.6% lead for the Athlon PRO 300GE. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon PRO 300GE vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300GE	Celeron G6900E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process	12 nm	10 nm-17%
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	4,342+2%	4,272
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,563
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,631

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900E — the Celeron G6900E supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs 20 (Celeron G6900E) — the Celeron G6900E offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon PRO 300GE) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900E).

Feature	Athlon PRO 300GE	Celeron G6900E
Socket	AM4	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	20+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900E). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon PRO 300GE) and UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon PRO 300GE targets Desktop, Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300GE	Celeron G6900E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 3	UHD Graphics 710
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon PRO 300GE was priced at $50, while the Celeron G6900E came in at $53. On launch pricing ($50 vs $53), Athlon PRO 300GE was $3 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 300GE delivers 86.8 pts/$ vs 80.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900E — making the Athlon PRO 300GE the 7.4% better value option.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300GE	Celeron G6900E
MSRP	$50-6%	$53
Performance per Dollar	86.8+8%	80.6
Release Date	2019	2022

Search Athlon PRO 300GE on Amazon

Search Celeron G6900E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.