
Athlon PRO 300GE

Xeon Bronze 3104
Athlon PRO 300GE vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon PRO 300GE vs Xeon Bronze 3104 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon PRO 300GE vs Xeon Bronze 3104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon PRO 300GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon Bronze 3104 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3104 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,342 vs 4,383).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3104, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Xeon Bronze 3104 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Bronze 3104
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 8.
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Bronze 3104 better than Athlon PRO 300GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 300GE vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 300GE
The Athlon PRO 300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,342 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Bronze 3104
The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 300GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3104 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Athlon PRO 300GE. The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300GE scores 4,342 against the Xeon Bronze 3104's 4,383 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3104. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon PRO 300GE vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3104.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300GE | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+100% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8.25 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 4,342 | 4,383 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — the Athlon PRO 300GE supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3104 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs 6 (Xeon Bronze 3104). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs 48 (Xeon Bronze 3104) — the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon PRO 300GE) and C621 (Xeon Bronze 3104).
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300GE | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+25% | 2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 48+500% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Bronze 3104 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3104). The Athlon PRO 300GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon PRO 300GE targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300GE | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















