
Athlon PRO 300GE

Core i5-3450S
Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3450S Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3450S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3450S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon PRO 300GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 243.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-3450S needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3450S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,342 vs 4,399).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Core i5-3450S
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.3 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3450S better than Athlon PRO 300GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3450S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 300GE
The Athlon PRO 300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,342 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-3450S
The Core i5-3450S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,399 points. Launch price was $150.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 300GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3450S offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-3450S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3450S — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3450S. The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-3450S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300GE scores 4,342 against the Core i5-3450S's 4,399 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-3450S. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon PRO 300GE vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-3450S.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300GE | Core i5-3450S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 6144 kB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,342 | 4,399+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3450S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300GE | Core i5-3450S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon PRO 300GE) / not specified (Core i5-3450S). The Athlon PRO 300GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i5-3450S requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon PRO 300GE targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300GE | Core i5-3450S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon PRO 300GE was priced at $50, while the Core i5-3450S came in at $174. On launch pricing ($50 vs $174), Athlon PRO 300GE was $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 300GE delivers 86.8 pts/$ vs 25.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3450S — making the Athlon PRO 300GE the 109.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300GE | Core i5-3450S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-71% | $174 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.8+243% | 25.3 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















