Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3475S

AMD

Athlon PRO 300GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-3475S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3475S Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3475S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3475S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon PRO 300GE

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $199 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 401.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 17.3 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-3475S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3475S.

Core i5-3475S

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon PRO 300GE.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,315 vs 4,342).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($249 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon PRO 300GE better than Core i5-3475S?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-3475S is ahead with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon PRO 300GE pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i5-3475S also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon PRO 300GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon PRO 300GE is the better buy right now. Athlon PRO 300GE comes in $199 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-3475S is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 401.1% better value on MSRP (86.8 vs 17.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 300GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Core i5-3475S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon PRO 300GE

The Athlon PRO 300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,342 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-3475S

The Core i5-3475S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,315 points. Launch price was $219.

Processing Power

The Athlon PRO 300GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3475S offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-3475S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3475S — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-3475S. The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-3475S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300GE scores 4,342 against the Core i5-3475S's 4,315 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon PRO 300GE. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon PRO 300GE vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3475S.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300GECore i5-3475S
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
12 nm-45%
22 nm
Architecture
Zen+ (2018−2019)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,342
4,315
Geekbench 6 Single
705
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,544
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3475S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3475S — the Athlon PRO 300GE supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon PRO 300GE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs 16 (Core i5-3475S) — the Core i5-3475S offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon PRO 300GE) and H61,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3475S).

FeatureAthlon PRO 300GECore i5-3475S
Socket
AM4
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+67%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon PRO 300GE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3475S). Both include integrated graphics Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon PRO 300GE) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3475S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon PRO 300GE targets Desktop, Core i5-3475S targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-3475S rivals FX-6300.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300GECore i5-3475S
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 3
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Desktop
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon PRO 300GE was priced at $50, while the Core i5-3475S came in at $249. On launch pricing ($50 vs $249), Athlon PRO 300GE was $199 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 300GE delivers 86.8 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3475S — making the Athlon PRO 300GE the 133.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300GECore i5-3475S
MSRP
$50-80%
$249
Performance per Dollar
86.8+402%
17.3
Release Date
2019
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.