Athlon PRO 300GE vs Opteron 3380

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Opteron 3380 Performance Spectrum

Athlon PRO 300GE

2 / 4

4,342

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Opteron 3380

8 / 8

4,358

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Opteron 3380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Opteron 3380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon PRO 300GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Delivers 356.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Opteron 3380 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 3380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,342 vs 4,358).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3380, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.

Opteron 3380

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.0 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 300GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3380 better than Athlon PRO 300GE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3380 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon PRO 300GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 3380 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 3380 is still the better call for a fresh build. Opteron 3380 comes in 358.0% more expensive on MSRP at $229 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon PRO 300GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 4,342 PassMark with 2 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon PRO 300GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon PRO 300GE vs Opteron 3380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 300GE

The Athlon PRO 300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 4,342 points. Launch price was $149.

Opteron 3380

The Opteron 3380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,358 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon PRO 300GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 3380 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 3380 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300GE versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 3380 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 3380. The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Opteron 3380 uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300GE scores 4,342 against the Opteron 3380's 4,358 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 3380. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon PRO 300GE vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3380.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300GE	Opteron 3380
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
Base Clock	—	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	8192 kB+700%
Process	12 nm-63%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	4,342	4,358

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon PRO 300GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3380 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300GE	Opteron 3380
Socket	AM4	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon PRO 300GE) / not specified (Opteron 3380). The Athlon PRO 300GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Opteron 3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon PRO 300GE targets Desktop.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300GE	Opteron 3380
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 3	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon PRO 300GE was priced at $50, while the Opteron 3380 came in at $229. On launch pricing ($50 vs $229), Athlon PRO 300GE was $179 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 300GE delivers 86.8 pts/$ vs 19.0 pts/$ for the Opteron 3380 — making the Athlon PRO 300GE the 128.1% better value option.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300GE	Opteron 3380
MSRP	$50-78%	$229
Performance per Dollar	86.8+357%	19.0
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Athlon PRO 300GE on Amazon

Search Opteron 3380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.