
Celeron G6900E

Core i5-3350P
Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-3350P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-3350P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-3350P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G6900E
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $136 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 253.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.6 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 46W instead of 69W, a 23W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,272 vs 4,314).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Core i5-3350P
2012Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 80.6 PassMark/$ ($189 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 69W vs 46W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while Celeron G6900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3350P better than Celeron G6900E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-3350P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900E
The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3350P
The Core i5-3350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 69 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,314 points. Launch price was $292.
Processing Power
The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-3350P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-3350P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3350P — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3350P (base: 3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-3350P uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the Core i5-3350P's 4,314 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-3350P. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3350P.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | Core i5-3350P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,272 | 4,314 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,563 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,631 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G6900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-3350P uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | Core i5-3350P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) / not specified (Core i5-3350P). The Celeron G6900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i5-3350P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | Core i5-3350P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 710 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G6900E was priced at $53, while the Core i5-3350P came in at $189. On launch pricing ($53 vs $189), Celeron G6900E was $136 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900E delivers 80.6 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-3350P — making the Celeron G6900E the 111.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | Core i5-3350P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $53-72% | $189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.6+254% | 22.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














