Celeron G6900E
VS
Core i7-2920XM

Celeron G6900E vs Core i7-2920XM

Intel

Celeron G6900E

2 Cores2 Thrd46 WWMax: 3 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Core i7-2920XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900E

#227
Core i5-12600
MSRP: $233|Avg: $250
106%
#228
Core i7-11700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $180
106%
#229
Core i5-10600
MSRP: $244|Avg: $159
106%
#230
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
MSRP: $193|Avg: $100
106%
#231
Core i7-8700B
MSRP: $303|Avg: $139
105%
#232
Ryzen 3 2200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $80
104%
#233
Core i3-9100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $80
104%
#234
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
MSRP: $479|Avg: $479
104%
#235
Ryzen 9 3900XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $390
103%
#236
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
102%
#237
Core i7-14700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $384
102%
#238
Core i3-13100TE
MSRP: $137|Avg: $137
102%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
101%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
100%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
100%
#242
Celeron G6900E
MSRP: $53|Avg: $53
100%
#243
Core i3-12300T
MSRP: $209|Avg: $164
100%
#244
Core i9-12900
MSRP: $519|Avg: $420
100%
#245
Ryzen 3 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
99%
#246
Core i7-11700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $299
99%
#247
Core i5-10600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $179
99%
#248
Core i3-10325
MSRP: $154|Avg: $130
98%
#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
98%
#250
Core i7-8086K
MSRP: $425|Avg: $178
98%
#251
Core i3-10300T
MSRP: $157|Avg: $100
98%
#252
Core i9-10900TE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $180
98%
#253
Core i9-12900T
MSRP: $489|Avg: $378
97%
#254
Core i5-12600T
MSRP: $223|Avg: $223
97%
#255
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
97%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
49%
#256
Ryzen 5 3500X
MSRP: $155|Avg: $171
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2920XM

#705
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1015%
#706
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1000%
#707
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
918%
#708
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
914%
#709
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
905%
#711
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
874%
#712
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
838%
#713
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
837%
#714
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
815%
#717
Core i7-2920XM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#718
Core i3-1315UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $250
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G6900E (2022) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G6900ECore i7-2920XM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($53)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2920XM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G6900ECore i7-2920XM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($53)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G6900E and Core i7-2920XM

Intel

Celeron G6900E

The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2920XM

The Core i7-2920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,336 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-2920XM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2920XM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2920XM — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-2920XM (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-2920XM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the Core i7-2920XM's 4,336 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-2920XM. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2920XM.

FeatureCeleron G6900ECore i7-2920XM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.5 GHz+17%
Base Clock
3 GHz+20%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-69%
32 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,272
4,336+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,563
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,631
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-2920XM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900E versus 1600 on the Core i7-2920XM — the Core i7-2920XM supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900E) vs 16 (Core i7-2920XM) — the Celeron G6900E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900E) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2920XM).

FeatureCeleron G6900ECore i7-2920XM
Socket
LGA1700
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
1600+31900%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+419430300%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-2920XM has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) vs true (Core i7-2920XM). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900E) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2920XM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400; Core i7-2920XM rivals Core i7-2820QM.

FeatureCeleron G6900ECore i7-2920XM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 710
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Budget