Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-6350HQ

Intel

Celeron G6900E

2 Cores2 Thrd46 WWMax: 3 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Core i5-6350HQ

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-6350HQ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-6350HQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-6350HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900E

2022

Why buy it

  • +94.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Core i5-6350HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-6350HQ

2016

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 46W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (803 vs 1,563).
  • Lower PassMark (4,255 vs 4,272).
  • Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900E better than Core i5-6350HQ?
Yes. Celeron G6900E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron G6900E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G6900E is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $53 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (80.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-6350HQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G6900E

The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-6350HQ

The Core i5-6350HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,255 points. Launch price was $306.

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-6350HQ offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-6350HQ has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-6350HQ — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-6350HQ (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-6350HQ uses Skylake-H (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the Core i5-6350HQ's 4,255 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G6900E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,563 vs 803, a 64.2% lead for the Celeron G6900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6350HQ.

FeatureCeleron G6900ECore i5-6350HQ
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.2 GHz+7%
Base Clock
3 GHz+30%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
256K (per core)+20380%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Skylake-H (2015−2016)
PassMark
4,272
4,255
Geekbench 6 Single
1,563+95%
803
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,631
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-6350HQ uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900E versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6350HQ — the Celeron G6900E supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900E) vs 16 (Core i5-6350HQ) — the Celeron G6900E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900E) and Skylake-H (Core i5-6350HQ).

FeatureCeleron G6900ECore i5-6350HQ
Socket
LGA1700
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+125%
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6350HQ). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900E) and Iris Pro Graphics 580 (Core i5-6350HQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget, Core i5-6350HQ targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400; Core i5-6350HQ rivals FX-9830P.

FeatureCeleron G6900ECore i5-6350HQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 710
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
High Performance Laptop