Celeron G6900E vs FX-6130
Celeron G6900E
FX-6130
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900E
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G6900E | FX-6130 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($53) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G6900E | FX-6130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+35%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($53) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G6900E and FX-6130
Celeron G6900E
The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.
FX-6130
The FX-6130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,353 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-6130 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6130 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6130 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the FX-6130 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-6130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the FX-6130's 4,353 — a 1.9% lead for the FX-6130. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6130.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | FX-6130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 4,272 | 4,353+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,563 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,631 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G6900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the FX-6130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | FX-6130 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) / not specified (FX-6130). The Celeron G6900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the FX-6130 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | FX-6130 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 710 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G6900E launched at $53 MSRP, while the FX-6130 debuted at $0. At current prices ($53 vs $40), the FX-6130 is $13 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900E delivers 80.6 pts/$ vs 108.8 pts/$ for the FX-6130 — making the FX-6130 the 29.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | FX-6130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $53 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $53 | $40-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.6 | 108.8+35% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G6900E and FX-6130
