Celeron G6900E vs FX-6130

Celeron G6900E vs FX-6130 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G6900E

2 / 2

4,272

0.0%

4,353

+1.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900E vs FX-6130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900E vs FX-6130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900E

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 46W instead of 95W, a 49W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM3+ and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while FX-6130 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6130 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,272 vs 4,353).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while FX-6130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

FX-6130

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌106.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 46W.
❌Older platform position on AM3+, while Celeron G6900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6130 better than Celeron G6900E?

Yes. FX-6130 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6130 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6130 is still the faster CPU overall, but Celeron G6900E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. FX-6130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G6900E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (80.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Celeron G6900E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2012) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM3+. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900E vs FX-6130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900E

The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6130

The FX-6130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,353 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-6130 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6130 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-6130 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the FX-6130 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-6130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the FX-6130's 4,353 — a 1.9% lead for the FX-6130. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6130.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	FX-6130
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.9 GHz+30%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	6 MB+380%
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,272	4,353+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,563	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,631	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the FX-6130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	FX-6130
Socket	LGA1700	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) / not specified (FX-6130). The Celeron G6900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the FX-6130 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	FX-6130
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900E was priced at $53, while the FX-6130 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($53 vs $0), FX-6130 was $53 cheaper.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	FX-6130
MSRP	$53	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	80.6	—
Release Date	2022	2012

Search Celeron G6900E on Amazon

Search FX-6130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.