
Celeron G6900E

Opteron 4376 HE
Celeron G6900E vs Opteron 4376 HE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G6900E vs Opteron 4376 HE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G6900E vs Opteron 4376 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G6900E
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 46W instead of 65W, a 19W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of C32 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Opteron 4376 HE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4376 HE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,272 vs 4,318).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4376 HE, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Opteron 4376 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 4376 HE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌41.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 46W.
- ❌Older platform position on C32, while Celeron G6900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 4376 HE better than Celeron G6900E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G6900E vs Opteron 4376 HE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900E
The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 4376 HE
The Opteron 4376 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,318 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Opteron 4376 HE offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4376 HE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 4376 HE — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 4376 HE (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 4376 HE uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the Opteron 4376 HE's 4,318 — a 1.1% lead for the Opteron 4376 HE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4376 HE.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 8+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+15% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8192 kB+540% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Seoul (2012) |
| PassMark | 4,272 | 4,318+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,563 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,631 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G6900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Opteron 4376 HE uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | C32 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) / not specified (Opteron 4376 HE). The Celeron G6900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Opteron 4376 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Celeron G6900E | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 710 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















