Core i5-3340M
VS
Celeron G4950

Core i5-3340M vs Celeron G4950

Intel

Core i5-3340M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G4950

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i5-3340M is positioned at rank #59 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3340M

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
99%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#47
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
218%
#48
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
215%
#49
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
197%
#50
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
196%
#51
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
194%
#53
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
188%
#54
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
180%
#55
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
180%
#56
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
175%
#59
Core i5-3340M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
98%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4950

#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
108%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
107%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
105%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
105%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
104%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
104%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
104%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
104%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
103%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
103%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
103%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
102%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
101%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
100%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
100%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
100%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
99%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
96%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
96%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
91%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
90%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
89%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
86%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
84%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
83%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
80%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
80%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
77%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
76%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4950 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-3340MCeleron G4950
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($63)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3340M (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-3340MCeleron G4950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($63)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3340M and Celeron G4950

Intel

Core i5-3340M

The Core i5-3340M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3340M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G4950's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-3340M versus 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 — a 3% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-3340M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G4950 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3340M scores 2,692 against the Celeron G4950's 2,714 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G4950. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3340M vs 2 MB on the Celeron G4950.

FeatureCore i5-3340MCeleron G4950
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+3%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.3 GHz+22%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
2,692
2,714
Geekbench 6 Single
672
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,229
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3340M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G4950 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 on the Core i5-3340M versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4950 — the Celeron G4950 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3340M) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4950).

FeatureCore i5-3340MCeleron G4950
Socket
PGA988
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-3340M) vs VT-x (Celeron G4950). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3340M) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4950) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3340M targets Professional Laptop, Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-3340M rivals AMD A10-4600M; Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.

FeatureCore i5-3340MCeleron G4950
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Professional Laptop
Budget