Core i5-3439Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

Core i5-3439Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-3439Y

2 / 4

1,957

0.0%

Pentium Extreme Edition 955

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

2 / 2

1,965

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3439Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3439Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3439Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,957 vs 1,965).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3439Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 better than Core i5-3439Y?

Yes. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 still makes the most sense overall. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3439Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-3439Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3439Y

The Core i5-3439Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,957 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,965 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3439Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-3439Y versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86. The Core i5-3439Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 uses Griffin (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3439Y scores 1,957 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86's 1,965 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3439Y vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86.

Feature	Core i5-3439Y	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Griffin (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,957	1,965
Geekbench 6 Single	472	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	966	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3439Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-3439Y versus DDR2-800 on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 — the Core i5-3439Y supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3439Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-3439Y) vs 0 (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86) — the Core i5-3439Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-3439Y	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Socket	BGA1023	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i5-3439Y) vs AMD-V (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86). The Core i5-3439Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3439Y targets Budget, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-3439Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.