
Core i5-3450S

Core i7-2820QM
Core i5-3450S vs Core i7-2820QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3450S vs Core i7-2820QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3450S vs Core i7-2820QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3450S
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $394 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 227.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.3 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2820QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2820QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-2820QM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-3450S needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,379 vs 4,399).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($568 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-3450S better than Core i7-2820QM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3450S vs Core i7-2820QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3450S
The Core i5-3450S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,399 points. Launch price was $150.

Core i7-2820QM
The Core i7-2820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,379 points. Launch price was $568.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3450S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2820QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3450S versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2820QM — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3450S (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-3450S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-2820QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3450S scores 4,399 against the Core i7-2820QM's 4,379 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-3450S. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-3450S vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2820QM.
| Feature | Core i5-3450S | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+22% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,399 | 4,379 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 554 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,763 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3450S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2820QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3450S | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-3450S) / true (Core i7-2820QM). The Core i7-2820QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i5-3450S requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2820QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i5-3450S | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3450S was priced at $174, while the Core i7-2820QM came in at $568. On launch pricing ($174 vs $568), Core i5-3450S was $394 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3450S delivers 25.3 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-2820QM — making the Core i5-3450S the 106.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3450S | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-69% | $568 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3+229% | 7.7 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














