Core i5-3550S
VS
Xeon E5-2609 v3

Core i5-3550S vs Xeon E5-2609 v3

Intel

Core i5-3550S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v3

6 Cores6 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-3550S is positioned at rank 758 and the Xeon E5-2609 v3 is on rank 728, so the Xeon E5-2609 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3550S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14385%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13592%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9869%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2973%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2355%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2060%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1180%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1165%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1060%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1060%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1048%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1020%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1006%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1002%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
993%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
100%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
100%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
98%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
97%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
97%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
97%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2609 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14244%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2689%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2389%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1846%
#423
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP: $6499|Avg: $3444
100%
#424
Xeon W-2155
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $150
99%
#425
Xeon 6740E
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $3949
99%
#425
Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP: $3583|Avg: $2097
99%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
99%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
98%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
98%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
98%
#728
Xeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP: $306|Avg: $306
100%
#731
Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
99%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($306) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i5-3550SXeon E5-2609 v3
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($306)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3550S ($100), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($206 less, 67% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i5-3550SXeon E5-2609 v3
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+204%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($306)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3550S and Xeon E5-2609 v3

Intel

Core i5-3550S

The Core i5-3550S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,442 points. Launch price was $350.

Intel

Xeon E5-2609 v3

The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,465 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3550S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-3550S versus 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 — a 64.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-3550S (base: 3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-3550S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3550S scores 4,442 against the Xeon E5-2609 v3's 4,465 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2609 v3. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-3550S vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v3.

FeatureCore i5-3550SXeon E5-2609 v3
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+95%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+58%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
15 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
4,442
4,465
Geekbench 6 Single
619
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3550S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3550SXeon E5-2609 v3
Socket
LGA1155
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3550S) / not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v3). The Core i5-3550S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3550S targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3550S rivals FX-6350.

FeatureCore i5-3550SXeon E5-2609 v3
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-3550S launched at $205 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 debuted at $306. At current prices ($100 vs $306), the Core i5-3550S is $206 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3550S delivers 44.4 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2609 v3 — making the Core i5-3550S the 101.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-3550SXeon E5-2609 v3
MSRP
$205-33%
$306
Avg Price (30d)
$100-67%
$306
Performance per Dollar
44.4+204%
14.6
Release Date
2012
2014