
Core i5-3570S

FX-6350
Core i5-3570S vs FX-6350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3570S vs FX-6350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3570S vs FX-6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3570S
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while FX-6350 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-6350.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
FX-6350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.2 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,640 vs 4,686).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3570S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3570S.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-6350 better than Core i5-3570S?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3570S vs FX-6350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3570S
The Core i5-3570S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,686 points. Launch price was $285.

FX-6350
The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3570S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-3570S versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 10% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-3570S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3570S scores 4,686 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-3570S.
| Feature | Core i5-3570S | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 6144 kB+2300% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,686 | 4,640 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 663 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3570S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3570S | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3570S) / not specified (FX-6350). The Core i5-3570S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the FX-6350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3570S targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3570S rivals A10-5800K.
| Feature | Core i5-3570S | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-3570S was priced at $213, while the FX-6350 came in at $132. On launch pricing ($213 vs $132), FX-6350 was $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3570S delivers 22.0 pts/$ vs 35.2 pts/$ for the FX-6350 — making the FX-6350 the 46% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-3570S | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $213 | $132-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 35.2+60% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















