Core i5-3570S vs Xeon X5667

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3570S vs Xeon X5667 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3570S vs Xeon X5667: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3570S

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2500, while Xeon X5667 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X5667.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5667 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,686 vs 4,697).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5667, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Xeon X5667 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5667

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3570S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3570S.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5667 better than Core i5-3570S?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5667 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3570S is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5667 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5667 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5667 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon X5667 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3570S only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3570S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-3570S vs Xeon X5667 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3570S

The Core i5-3570S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,686 points. Launch price was $285.

Xeon X5667

The Xeon X5667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,697 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3570S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5667's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-3570S versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5667 — a 9.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-3570S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Core i5-3570S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5667 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3570S scores 4,686 against the Xeon X5667's 4,697 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5667. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3570S vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5667.

Feature	Core i5-3570S	Xeon X5667
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+10%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+1%	3.06 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	4,686	4,697
Geekbench 6 Single	663	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3570S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5667 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3570S versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5667 — the Core i5-3570S supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-3570S) vs 3 (Xeon X5667). Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3570S) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5667).

Feature	Core i5-3570S	Xeon X5667
Socket	LGA1155	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-3570S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon X5667 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3570S targets Legacy Desktop, Xeon X5667 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-3570S rivals A10-5800K; Xeon X5667 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Core i5-3570S	Xeon X5667
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 2500	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	Workstation