Core i5-3610ME
VS
Core i7-3687U

Core i5-3610ME vs Core i7-3687U

Intel

Core i5-3610ME

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-3687U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-3610ME is positioned at rank 1089 and the Core i7-3687U is on rank 654, so the Core i7-3687U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3610ME

#1077
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3053%
#1078
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3008%
#1079
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2762%
#1080
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2749%
#1081
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2724%
#1083
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2631%
#1084
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2522%
#1085
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2518%
#1086
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2451%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
100%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
97%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
96%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3687U

#642
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
896%
#643
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
882%
#644
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
810%
#645
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
806%
#646
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
799%
#648
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
772%
#649
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
740%
#650
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
739%
#651
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
719%
#654
Core i7-3687U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
98%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3687U leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-3610ME is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-3610MECore i7-3687U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-3610MECore i7-3687U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3610ME and Core i7-3687U

Intel

Core i5-3610ME

The Core i5-3610ME is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,652 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-3687U

The Core i7-3687U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,621 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-3610ME and Core i7-3687U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3610ME versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3687U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-3610ME scores 2,652 against the Core i7-3687U's 2,621 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-3610ME. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 585 vs 640, a 9% lead for the Core i7-3687U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3610ME vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3687U.

FeatureCore i5-3610MECore i7-3687U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+29%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,652+1%
2,621
Geekbench 6 Single
585
640+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,240
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3610ME uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3687U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i7-3687U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM77,QM67 (Core i5-3610ME) and QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3687U).

FeatureCore i5-3610MECore i7-3687U
Socket
G2
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3610ME) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3687U). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3610ME) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3687U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3610ME targets Embedded, Core i7-3687U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core i5-3610ME rivals Embedded R-Series; Core i7-3687U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.

FeatureCore i5-3610MECore i7-3687U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Embedded
Enthusiast