Core i5-3610ME
VS
Xeon E5-2407

Core i5-3610ME vs Xeon E5-2407

Intel

Core i5-3610ME

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2407

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-3610ME is positioned at rank 1089 and the Xeon E5-2407 is on rank 852, so the Xeon E5-2407 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3610ME

#1077
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3053%
#1078
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3008%
#1079
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2762%
#1080
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2749%
#1081
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2724%
#1083
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2631%
#1084
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2522%
#1085
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2518%
#1086
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2451%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
100%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
97%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
96%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2407

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19532%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3688%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3277%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2531%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
100%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
99%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
98%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
98%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
96%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
96%
#852
Xeon E5-2407
MSRP: $250|Avg: $25
100%
#857
Xeon 5120
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#859
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
98%
#861
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
97%
#862
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
97%
#863
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($25) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2407 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i5-3610MEXeon E5-2407
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($22)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3610ME ($22), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($3 less, 12% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i5-3610MEXeon E5-2407
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+13%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($22)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-3610ME and Xeon E5-2407

Intel

Core i5-3610ME

The Core i5-3610ME is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,652 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon E5-2407

The Xeon E5-2407 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $335.

Processing Power

The Core i5-3610ME packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2407 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2407 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3610ME versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i5-3610ME (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-3610ME uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3610ME scores 2,652 against the Xeon E5-2407's 2,659 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2407. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3610ME vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407.

FeatureCore i5-3610MEXeon E5-2407
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+50%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+23%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
10240 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark
2,652
2,659
Geekbench 6 Single
585
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3610ME uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-3610MEXeon E5-2407
Socket
G2
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3610ME) / not specified (Xeon E5-2407). The Core i5-3610ME includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5-2407 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3610ME targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-3610ME rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureCore i5-3610MEXeon E5-2407
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-3610ME launched at $276 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2407 debuted at $250. At current prices ($22 vs $25), the Core i5-3610ME is $3 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-3610ME delivers 120.5 pts/$ vs 106.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2407 — making the Core i5-3610ME the 12.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-3610MEXeon E5-2407
MSRP
$276
$250-9%
Avg Price (30d)
$22-12%
$25
Performance per Dollar
120.5+13%
106.4
Release Date
2012
2012