Core i5-4210U
VS
Celeron G3950

Core i5-4210U vs Celeron G3950

Intel

Core i5-4210U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron G3950

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4210U is positioned at rank 214 and the Celeron G3950 is on rank 457, so the Core i5-4210U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4210U

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#202
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
380%
#203
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
374%
#204
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
344%
#205
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
342%
#206
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
339%
#208
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
327%
#209
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
314%
#210
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
313%
#211
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
305%
#214
Core i5-4210U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3950

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6939%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6557%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4761%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1434%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1136%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
994%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
569%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
562%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
512%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
511%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
506%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
492%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
485%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
483%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
479%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
100%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
100%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
99%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
99%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
98%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
98%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
100%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
99%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
99%
#467
Celeron G3900TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $45
98%
#471
Pentium G4620
MSRP: $86|Avg: $154
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3950 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-4210UCeleron G3950
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4210U (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-4210UCeleron G3950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4210U and Celeron G3950

Intel

Core i5-4210U

The Core i5-4210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,316 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Celeron G3950

The Celeron G3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,336 points. Launch price was $52.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4210U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3950's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-4210U versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G3950 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G3950 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-4210U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G3950 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4210U scores 2,316 against the Celeron G3950's 2,336 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G3950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 763 vs 750, a 1.7% lead for the Core i5-4210U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4210U vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3950.

FeatureCore i5-4210UCeleron G3950
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3 GHz+11%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3 GHz+76%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,316
2,336
Geekbench 6 Single
763+2%
750
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4210U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3950 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4210U versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3950 — the Celeron G3950 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4210U) vs 16 (Celeron G3950) — the Celeron G3950 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4210U) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3950).

FeatureCore i5-4210UCeleron G3950
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210U) vs VT-x (Celeron G3950). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4400 (Core i5-4210U) and HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3950) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210U targets Thin & Light Laptop, Celeron G3950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210U rivals A8-6410; Celeron G3950 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureCore i5-4210UCeleron G3950
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Thin & Light Laptop
Budget