Core i5-4250U
VS
Celeron G3900

Core i5-4250U vs Celeron G3900

Intel

Core i5-4250U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G3900

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4250U is positioned at rank 100 and the Celeron G3900 is on rank 419, so the Core i5-4250U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4250U

#88
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
274%
#89
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
270%
#90
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
248%
#91
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
246%
#92
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
244%
#94
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
236%
#95
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
226%
#96
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
226%
#97
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
220%
#100
Core i5-4250U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#102
N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
100%
#106
Ryzen 5 2500U
MSRP: $349|Avg: N/A
98%
#109
Celeron 4305U
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#110
Celeron J1850
MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A
97%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6075%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5740%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4168%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1256%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
995%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
870%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
498%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
492%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
448%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
448%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
443%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
431%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
425%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
423%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
419%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
96%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
95%
#419
Celeron G3900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
100%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
99%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
99%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
97%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
97%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-4250U leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G3900 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-4250UCeleron G3900
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-4250UCeleron G3900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4250U and Celeron G3900

Intel

Core i5-4250U

The Core i5-4250U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,144 points. Launch price was $430.

Intel

Celeron G3900

The Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,155 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4250U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3900's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-4250U versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G3900 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-4250U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G3900 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4250U scores 2,144 against the Celeron G3900's 2,155 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 770 vs 680, a 12.4% lead for the Core i5-4250U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,450 vs 1,250 (14.8% advantage for the Core i5-4250U). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4250U vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3900.

FeatureCore i5-4250UCeleron G3900
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
2.8 GHz+115%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,144
2,155
Geekbench 6 Single
770+13%
680
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,450+16%
1,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4250U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3900 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4250U versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900 — the Celeron G3900 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4250U) vs 16 (Celeron G3900) — the Celeron G3900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Haswell-ULT (Core i5-4250U) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900).

FeatureCore i5-4250UCeleron G3900
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 5000 (Core i5-4250U) and Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4250U targets Budget, Celeron G3900 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4250U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U; Celeron G3900 rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureCore i5-4250UCeleron G3900
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 5000
Intel HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Desktop