Core i5-430UM vs Celeron M 723
Core i5-430UM
Celeron M 723
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-430UM is positioned at rank 934 and the Celeron M 723 is on rank 1153, so the Core i5-430UM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-430UM
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 723
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-430UM | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($161) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-430UM | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($161) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-430UM and Celeron M 723
Core i5-430UM
The Core i5-430UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron M 723
The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-430UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 723 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i5-430UM has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Core i5-430UM versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 — a 36.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-430UM. The Core i5-430UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 723 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-430UM scores 1,185 against the Celeron M 723's 1,180 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-430UM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 100, a 85.7% lead for the Core i5-430UM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 500 vs 100 (133.3% advantage for the Core i5-430UM).
| Feature | Core i5-430UM | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.73 GHz+44% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,185 | 1,180 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250+150% | 100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 500+400% | 100 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-430UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 723 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Core i5-430UM versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 — the Core i5-430UM supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-430UM) vs 0 (Celeron M 723) — the Core i5-430UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55 (Core i5-430UM) and GS45 (Celeron M 723).
| Feature | Core i5-430UM | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-430UM) vs None (Celeron M 723). The Core i5-430UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-430UM targets Legacy Ultrabook, Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-430UM rivals Pentium SU7300; Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.
| Feature | Core i5-430UM | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | None |
| Target Use | Legacy Ultrabook | Legacy Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-430UM and Celeron M 723
