
Core i5-4460S

Xeon X5667
Core i5-4460S vs Xeon X5667 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4460S vs Xeon X5667 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4460S vs Xeon X5667: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4460S
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon X5667 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Xeon X5667.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5667 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,645 vs 4,697).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5667, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Xeon X5667 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon X5667
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4460S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4460S.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon X5667 better than Core i5-4460S?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4460S vs Xeon X5667 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4460S
The Core i5-4460S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,645 points. Launch price was $182.

Xeon X5667
The Xeon X5667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,697 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4460S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5667's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4460S versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5667 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5667 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Core i5-4460S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5667 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4460S scores 4,645 against the Xeon X5667's 4,697 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon X5667. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4460S vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5667.
| Feature | Core i5-4460S | Xeon X5667 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.46 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.06 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 4,645 | 4,697+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 847 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,614 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4460S uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5667 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4460S versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5667 — the Core i5-4460S supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-4460S) vs 3 (Xeon X5667). Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4460S) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5667).
| Feature | Core i5-4460S | Xeon X5667 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+20% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i5-4460S) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5667). The Core i5-4460S includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon X5667 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4460S targets Office Desktop, Xeon X5667 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5667 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i5-4460S | Xeon X5667 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Office Desktop | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













